Fast dev workstation!

Working a new gig, they gave me a pretty nice little workstation,
dual-core 3ghz 2.5gb RAM, don't know what the disk is except it's
80gb.
Anyway, I'm working a GL project where we have to produce about 30m
debits and credits from 2.5m transactions.
The SQL is something like:
select
tranid, x1, a2, gl
into #myfoo
from trantable -- 2.5m rows
cross join xtable -- 12 rows
inner join GLCOA on x1 = a1 -- 300k rows
inner join attribute table on trancode=attribcode -- ten rows
(selecting into the temp just so I don't have to wait for 30m rows to
scroll into query analyzer)
So, guess how long this takes to run, workstation running XP and
SQL2K?
.
.
.
.
Answer: two minutes
Two minutes!?!?
I'm impressed.
When I was a lad, it would have taken quite a while running at 4.77mhz
to generate and write 30m records onto diskettes, I'm just saying, but
even running SQL7 on a 300mhz two-CPU server seven years ago, would
have been easily 10x slower.
I gotta look into the disk config, it's just one drive, this is an HP
workstation.
J.
ps - for all that, the shop is a little chintzy on the monitors, just
a 17 inch 1280x flat panel, OK, but could be better. Not directly a
SQLServer issue. and the mouse has a cord and a ball.On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 22:44:04 -0800, JXStern <JXSternChangeX2R@.gte.net>
wrote:
>So, guess how long this takes to run, workstation running XP and
>SQL2K?
>.
>.
>Answer: two minutes
OK, two and a half.
But even so, isn't anybody else amazed at this?
Perhaps too easily amused,
J.

Fast dev workstation!

Working a new gig, they gave me a pretty nice little workstation,
dual-core 3ghz 2.5gb RAM, don't know what the disk is except it's
80gb.
Anyway, I'm working a GL project where we have to produce about 30m
debits and credits from 2.5m transactions.
The SQL is something like:
select
tranid, x1, a2, gl
into #myfoo
from trantable-- 2.5m rows
cross join xtable-- 12 rows
inner join GLCOA on x1 = a1-- 300k rows
inner join attribute table on trancode=attribcode -- ten rows
(selecting into the temp just so I don't have to wait for 30m rows to
scroll into query analyzer)
So, guess how long this takes to run, workstation running XP and
SQL2K?
..
..
..
..
Answer: two minutes
Two minutes!?!?
I'm impressed.
When I was a lad, it would have taken quite a while running at 4.77mhz
to generate and write 30m records onto diskettes, I'm just saying, but
even running SQL7 on a 300mhz two-CPU server seven years ago, would
have been easily 10x slower.
I gotta look into the disk config, it's just one drive, this is an HP
workstation.
J.
ps - for all that, the shop is a little chintzy on the monitors, just
a 17 inch 1280x flat panel, OK, but could be better. Not directly a
SQLServer issue. and the mouse has a cord and a ball.
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 22:44:04 -0800, JXStern <JXSternChangeX2R@.gte.net>
wrote:
>So, guess how long this takes to run, workstation running XP and
>SQL2K?
>.
>.
>Answer: two minutes
OK, two and a half.
But even so, isn't anybody else amazed at this?
Perhaps too easily amused,
J.

Fast dev workstation!

Working a new gig, they gave me a pretty nice little workstation,
dual-core 3ghz 2.5gb RAM, don't know what the disk is except it's
80gb.
Anyway, I'm working a GL project where we have to produce about 30m
debits and credits from 2.5m transactions.
The SQL is something like:
select
tranid, x1, a2, gl
into #myfoo
from trantable -- 2.5m rows
cross join xtable -- 12 rows
inner join GLCOA on x1 = a1 -- 300k rows
inner join attribute table on trancode=attribcode -- ten rows
(selecting into the temp just so I don't have to wait for 30m rows to
scroll into query analyzer)
So, guess how long this takes to run, workstation running XP and
SQL2K?
.
.
.
.
Answer: two minutes
Two minutes!?!?
I'm impressed.
When I was a lad, it would have taken quite a while running at 4.77mhz
to generate and write 30m records onto diskettes, I'm just saying, but
even running SQL7 on a 300mhz two-CPU server seven years ago, would
have been easily 10x slower.
I gotta look into the disk config, it's just one drive, this is an HP
workstation.
J.
ps - for all that, the shop is a little chintzy on the monitors, just
a 17 inch 1280x flat panel, OK, but could be better. Not directly a
SQLServer issue. and the mouse has a cord and a ball.On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 22:44:04 -0800, JXStern <JXSternChangeX2R@.gte.net>
wrote:
>So, guess how long this takes to run, workstation running XP and
>SQL2K?
>.
>.
>Answer: two minutes
OK, two and a half.
But even so, isn't anybody else amazed at this?
Perhaps too easily amused,
J.

Failure sending mail: The system cannot find the path specified.

I have had a development XP workstation with RS2000 and IIS sending reports via email for 6 months straight with no problems.

Today my subscriptions are failing with

Failure sending mail: The system cannot find the path specified.

Been searching and digging for hours, and if anyone has any ideas they are greatly appreciated.

I need some info to troubleshoot...

Replicate the issue, then go the Report Server log (ReportServer_xxx_xxx.log) and email the log to me for review. markcam80@.hotmail.com

What I will be looking for is explicit error messages versus the displayed message.

|||Thanks for the help but it seems we had a domain controller misbehaving.