Greetings,
I have a feature request for the Enterprise Studio.
We have about 500+ stored procedures in our CRM application and opening up
Enterprise Manager (in 2000) or Enterprise Studio (2005) I have to look at a
huge list of stored procedures and find the one I'm specifically looking
for. Granted, in 2005 there is a "filter" it is rather unintuitive.
I'd like to request the abililty to add my own "folder" to the list where I
can create categories to group my stored procedures. for example, I can
create a "Invoices" group where all my invoice related SP's go, and a
"Policies" group where all my policies related SP's will go. In addition to
this, we have more tables than SPs, so we should be able to group any
object, Table, SP, View, etc.
Not sure if you've considered this already but the filtering isn't as
intuitive. It requires me to have to constantly enter in new filters to
filter the list before I can browse around. I'd like to browse directly to
what I'm looking for.
Thanks,
Shawn
Hi Shawn,
Have you considered using Schemas for this? (Introduced in SQL Server 2005
also).
HTH,
Greg Low [MVP]
MSDE Manager SQL Tools
www.whitebearconsulting.com
"Shawn B." <leabre@.html.com> wrote in message
news:OLcOBc6zEHA.1564@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Greetings,
> I have a feature request for the Enterprise Studio.
> We have about 500+ stored procedures in our CRM application and opening up
> Enterprise Manager (in 2000) or Enterprise Studio (2005) I have to look at
> a
> huge list of stored procedures and find the one I'm specifically looking
> for. Granted, in 2005 there is a "filter" it is rather unintuitive.
> I'd like to request the abililty to add my own "folder" to the list where
> I
> can create categories to group my stored procedures. for example, I can
> create a "Invoices" group where all my invoice related SP's go, and a
> "Policies" group where all my policies related SP's will go. In addition
> to
> this, we have more tables than SPs, so we should be able to group any
> object, Table, SP, View, etc.
> Not sure if you've considered this already but the filtering isn't as
> intuitive. It requires me to have to constantly enter in new filters to
> filter the list before I can browse around. I'd like to browse directly
> to
> what I'm looking for.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>
|||What are schemas in this context? after a cursory google and help topics
lookup, I have no clue what they can do for me.
Thanks,
Shawn
"Greg Low [MVP]" <greglow@.lowell.com.au> wrote in message
news:e8NiNJ8zEHA.2528@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hi Shawn,
> Have you considered using Schemas for this? (Introduced in SQL Server 2005
> also).
> HTH,
> --
> Greg Low [MVP]
> MSDE Manager SQL Tools
> www.whitebearconsulting.com
> "Shawn B." <leabre@.html.com> wrote in message
> news:OLcOBc6zEHA.1564@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
up[vbcol=seagreen]
at[vbcol=seagreen]
where[vbcol=seagreen]
addition
>
|||I believe this has been suggested before but to make sure please send the
details of your request to sqlwish@.microsoft.com
HTH
Jasper Smith (SQL Server MVP)
http://www.sqldbatips.com
I support PASS - the definitive, global
community for SQL Server professionals -
http://www.sqlpass.org
"Shawn B." <leabre@.html.com> wrote in message
news:OLcOBc6zEHA.1564@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Greetings,
> I have a feature request for the Enterprise Studio.
> We have about 500+ stored procedures in our CRM application and opening up
> Enterprise Manager (in 2000) or Enterprise Studio (2005) I have to look at
> a
> huge list of stored procedures and find the one I'm specifically looking
> for. Granted, in 2005 there is a "filter" it is rather unintuitive.
> I'd like to request the abililty to add my own "folder" to the list where
> I
> can create categories to group my stored procedures. for example, I can
> create a "Invoices" group where all my invoice related SP's go, and a
> "Policies" group where all my policies related SP's will go. In addition
> to
> this, we have more tables than SPs, so we should be able to group any
> object, Table, SP, View, etc.
> Not sure if you've considered this already but the filtering isn't as
> intuitive. It requires me to have to constantly enter in new filters to
> filter the list before I can browse around. I'd like to browse directly
> to
> what I'm looking for.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>
|||Hi Shawn,
Take a look at the Northwind sample database in SQL Server 2005 Beta if you
have access to it from the MSDN site. Whereas Northwind's tables, procs,
etc. before were just one big list, now there are separate schemas for
HumanResources, etc. with only those objects relevant to that part of the
app in them.
HTH,
Greg Low [MVP]
MSDE Manager SQL Tools
www.whitebearconsulting.com
"Shawn B." <leabre@.html.com> wrote in message
news:OWVSG5A0EHA.1192@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> What are schemas in this context? after a cursory google and help topics
> lookup, I have no clue what they can do for me.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>
> "Greg Low [MVP]" <greglow@.lowell.com.au> wrote in message
> news:e8NiNJ8zEHA.2528@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> up
> at
> where
> addition
>
|||Sorry, brain explosion - meant to point you to the Adventureworks sample,
not Northwind.
HTH,
Greg Low [MVP]
MSDE Manager SQL Tools
www.whitebearconsulting.com
"Greg Low [MVP]" <greglow@.lowell.com.au> wrote in message
news:OLy2UoU0EHA.3244@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Hi Shawn,
> Take a look at the Northwind sample database in SQL Server 2005 Beta if
> you have access to it from the MSDN site. Whereas Northwind's tables,
> procs, etc. before were just one big list, now there are separate schemas
> for HumanResources, etc. with only those objects relevant to that part of
> the app in them.
> HTH,
> --
> Greg Low [MVP]
> MSDE Manager SQL Tools
> www.whitebearconsulting.com
> "Shawn B." <leabre@.html.com> wrote in message
> news:OWVSG5A0EHA.1192@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>
Friday, March 23, 2012
Feature Request: 2005 Beta 2
Labels:
application,
beta,
crm,
database,
enterprise,
feature,
greetings,
microsoft,
mysql,
opening,
oracle,
procedures,
request,
server,
sql,
stored,
studio,
upenterprise
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment